This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-07-10 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| (1) The present possessor may complete the period necessary for prescription by tacking his possession to that of his grantor or predecessor-in-interest. While the supposed donation of the subject lot by the Spouses Andres and Trinidad to Venustiano was not evidenced by a written instrument, the relationship between them is not in dispute, i.e., the former were the progenitors of the latter. Even if the donation was void, the tacking of possession must be allowed, considering the undisputed relationship between the Spouses Andres and Trinidad, and Venustiano. We ruled in this wise in South City Homes, Inc. v. Republic.[38] | |||||