You're currently signed in as:
User

DOMINGO V. LUGTU v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2000-10-02
PER CURIAM
Beyond this, long-settled is the rule that the discharge of a defendant, in order that he may be called to testify against his co-defendants, is within the sound discretion of the court;[60] the discharge of an accused in order that he may be utilized as a state witness is expressly left to the sound discretion of the court.[61]