Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR No. 166859 2011-04-12	REPUBLIC v. SANDIGANBAYAN BERSAMIN, J.
SO ORDERED.[47]
	GR Nos. 177857-58 2009-09-17	PHILIPPINE COCONUT PRODUCERS FEDERATION v. REPUBLIC VELASCO JR., J.
And in Republic v. Sandiganbayan,[11] the Court observed that "the PCGG's power to sequester alleged ill-gotten properties is likened to the provisional remedies of preliminary attachment or receivership which are always subject to the control of the court."
	GR No. 139941 2001-01-19	VICENTE B. CHUIDIAN v. SANDIGANBAYAN YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
x x x Movant has basis in pointing out that inasmuch as the L/C was issued in his favor, he is presumed to be the lawful payee-beneficiary of the L/C until such time that the plaintiff successfully proves that said L/C is ill-gotten and he has no right over the same.[42] In Republic v. Sandiganbayan,[43] we held that the provisional remedies, such as freeze orders and sequestration, were not "meant to deprive the owner or possessor of his title or any right to the property sequestered, frozen or taken over and vest it in the sequestering agency, the Government or other person."