This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2004-03-09 |
YNARES-SATIAGO, J. |
||||
| We thus uphold the Labor Arbiter's finding that the position of Property Custodian had been abolished. The abolition of a position deemed no longer necessary is a management prerogative, and this Court, absent any findings of malice and arbitrariness on the part of management, will not efface such privilege if only to protect the person holding that office.[44] | |||||