This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2003-12-02 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
| In People v. Acosta,[32] this Court rejected the identification by a witness of the accused while the latter was alone in his detention cell. There, this Court held that the identification of the suspect, which was tainted by the suggestiveness of having the witness identify him while he was incarcerated with no one else with him with whom he might be compared by the witness, was less than objective to thus impair the trustworthiness of their identification.[33] | |||||