This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-01-18 |
AZCUNA, J. |
||||
| The Court rules that private respondents' claim for back salaries is untenable because their suspension was authorized by law and they have not been absolved of the administrative charges filed against them.[38] In Gloria v. Court of Appeals,[39] this Court had the occasion to clarify that the payment of salaries corresponding to the period when an employee is not allowed to work may be decreed if he is found innocent of the charges which caused his suspension and when the suspension is unjustified. | |||||