You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. BONIFACIO SANZ MACEDA

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2005-11-25
AZCUNA, J.
Contempt of court presupposes a contumacious attitude, a flouting or arrogant belligerence in defiance of the court.[55] There is nothing contemptuous about the statements and information contained in the health advisory that were distributed by DOH before the TRO was issued by this Court ordering the former to cease and desist from distributing the same.