This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-12-18 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| The LRA Administrator has admitted that the Torrens title of the Manotoks "is thus presumed valid."[126] The law recognizes that the Manotoks' Torrens title is "evidence of an indefeasible title to the property in favor of the person whose name appears therein."[127] Even assuming, for the sake of argument, that the prior title of the Manotoks is spurious, still under Ladignon v. Court of Appeals,[128] such title can only cancelled by the proper Regional Trial Court in a direct proceeding assailing its validity. | |||||