This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2011-06-15 |
DEL CASTILLO, J. |
||||
| Umale then filed his appeal [28] with the CA insisting that the parties did not enter into a lease contract. [29] Assuming that there was a lease, it was at most an implied lease. Hence its period depended on the rent payments. Since Umale paid rent annually, ASB Realty had to respect his lease for the entire year. It cannot terminate the lease at the end of the month, as it did in its Notice of Termination of Lease. [30] Lastly, Umale insisted that it was the rehabilitation receiver, not ASB Realty, that was the real party-in-interest. [31] | |||||