You're currently signed in as:
User

JOSEPHINE C. MARTINEZ v. JUDGE CESAR N. ZOLETA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2007-02-14
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
It should be borne in mind that a resolution of the Court requiring comment on an administrative complaint against officials and employees of the judiciary should not be construed as a mere request from the Court, nor should it be complied with partially, inadequately, or selectively.[15]  Moreover, the Court should not and will not tolerate future indifference of respondent to administrative complaint and resolutions requiring comment on such administrative complaint.[16]  Respondent's deliberate refusal to comply with the Resolutions of this Court evinces gross misconduct and insubordination.[17]