You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. RODOLFO DELA CUESTA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2008-07-09
TINGA, J,
The alleged minor inconsistencies in AAA's testimony pertain only to collateral or minor incidents of the case and they do not affect the real issue, which is whether or not appellant indeed raped his daughter, AAA.As long as the witness has been found credible by the trial court, especially after undergoing a rigid cross-examination, any apparent inconsistency may be overlooked. This is especially true if the lapses concern trivial matters.[36]