This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-03-04 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| Petitioner cannot avail himself of the mitigating circumstance of intoxication merely on the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses that he was drunk during the incident.[43] Such testimonies do not warrant a conclusion that the degree of petitioner's intoxication had affected his faculties.[44] There must be convincing proof of the nature and effect of his intoxication which petitioner failed to adduce in the present case.[45] | |||||