This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2009-06-26 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| If a robber tries to prevent the commission of homicide after the commission of the robbery, he is guilty only of robbery and not of robbery with homicide. All those who conspire to commit robbery with homicide are guilty as principals of such crime, although not all profited and gained from the robbery. One who joins a criminal conspiracy adopts the criminal designs of his co-conspirators and can no longer repudiate the conspiracy once it has materialized.[44] | |||||
|
2006-02-28 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| Physical evidence is a mute but eloquent manifestation of truth and rates highly in the hierarchy of trustworthy evidence. It enjoys a far more superior probative weight than corroborative testimonies.[29] In the instant case, the autopsy report negates the lone witness's account of the participation of petitioner in the stabbing of the victim. | |||||
|
2004-01-15 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| Such lack of evidence renders incredible the prosecution's accusation that Galabo inflicted blows on Gloria. Physical evidence is mute but an eloquent manifestation of truth and rates highly in the hierarchy of trustworthy evidence.[27] It enjoys a far more superior probative weight than corroborative testimonies.[28] In this case, the absence of physical injuries and medical findings negate Gloria's claim that she was hit by petitioner Galabo. | |||||