You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

REPORT OF FINANCIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED ON ACCOUNTS OF CLERK OF COURT ZENAIDA GARCIA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 140519
2001-08-21
PHILIPPINE RETIREMENT AUTHORITY v. THELMA RUPA
PUNO, J.
Under the Civil Service law and rules, there is no concrete description of what specific acts constitute the grave offense of Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service.  Jurisprudence, however, is instructive on this point.  The Court has considered the following acts or omissions, inter alia, as Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service: misappropriation of public funds, abandonment of office, failure to report back to work without prior notice,[6] failure to safe keep public records and property,[7] making false entries in public documents and falsification of court orders.[8]