This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-06-09 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| In a resolution dated February 22, 1994, the RTC of Pasig City denied petitioner's motion to dismiss and granted respondent's motion for summary judgment.[3] Petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration but it was denied.[4] Petitioner then belatedly filed a notice of appeal which it later withdrew. Instead, petitioner assailed the February 22, 1994 resolution in a petition for certiorari[5] which was dismissed.[6] Petitioner elevated the case to us but the same was denied for having been filed out of time.[7] | |||||
|
2003-06-27 |
CALLEJO, SR., J. |
||||
| Verily, from all the foregoing discussion, the questioned Resolutions of the Respondent Judge suffers from the infirmities of having been issued/rendered with grave abuse of his discretion or in excess of his jurisdiction. Being a patent nullity is like "A DEAD LIMB ON THE JUDICIAL THREE (sic) WHICH SHOULD BE LOPPED OFF AND WHOLLY DISREGARDED." (ANURAN vs. AQUINO, 38 Phil. 29)[13] The said petition was remanded by this Court to the CA, and docketed therein as CA-G.R. SP No. 36500. | |||||