This case has been cited 4 times or more.
|
2010-11-15 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| The NLRC's resolution became final ten (10) days after counsel's receipt, and the respondents' failure to file the petition within the required (60)-day period rendered it impervious to any attack through a Rule 65 petition for certiorari. Thus, no court can exercise jurisdiction to review the resolution.[23] | |||||
|
2009-12-18 |
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J. |
||||
| xxx Once a decision is final and executory, it can no longer be attacked by any party or be modified directly or indirectly, even by the Court (Philippine Commercial & Industrial Bank v. Court of Appeals) [61] . | |||||
|
2008-03-04 |
REYES, R.T., J. |
||||
| As often repeated by this Court, for the special civil action of certiorari to lie, it must be shown that the tribunal, board or officer exercising judicial functions acted without or in excess of jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction, and that there is no appeal nor any plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law for the purpose of amending or nullifying the proceeding.[64] The sole purpose of the writ of certiorari is the correction of errors of jurisdiction including the commission of grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction. [65] A special civil action of certiorari does not include correction of public respondent's evaluation of the evidence and factual findings thereon.[66] | |||||