This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-09-11 |
REYES, R.T., J. |
||||
| e) Other causes analogous to the foregoing. In Austria v. National Labor Relations Commission,[45] the Court defined misconduct as "improper and wrongful conduct. It is the transgression of some established and definite rule of action, a forbidden act, a dereliction of duty, willful in character, and implies wrongful intent and not mere error in judgment."[46] In Camus v. Civil Service Board of Appeals,[47] misconduct was described as "wrong or improper conduct."[48] It implies a wrongful intention and not a mere error of judgment.[49] | |||||