This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2006-01-31 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| Finally, the Court does not need to delve into the issue of MRTDC's legal capacity. Suffice it to state that Gammon is estopped from challenging MRTDC's alleged lack of capacity to sue after having acknowledged the latter's legal capacity by entering into a contract with it.[23] | |||||