You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

ROGELIA P. DIAZ-DUARTE v. SPS. BEN AND ETHYL ONG

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR No. 128563
2004-03-25
EQUATORIAL REALTY DEVELOPMENT v. SPS. DESIDERIO AND EDARLINA FROGOZO
TINGA, J,
To hold otherwise would be to deprive petitioners of their property, who waited a long time to complete payments on their property, convinced that their interest was amply protected by the inscribed adverse claim.[10] The ruling in Sajonas found reiteration and affirmation in Diaz-Duarte v. Ong.[11]