You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

ANNIE TAN v. OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

GR NOS. 160577-94
2005-12-16
GREGORIO SINGIAN v. SANDIGANBAYAN
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
In sum, the Ombudsman and the Sandiganbayan were far from being abusive of their discretions. On the contrary, their findings were based on evidence extant in the records. In finding probable cause against petitioner, there was no grave abuse of discretion committed so as to call for the exercise of our supervisory powers over them. This Court is not a trier of facts.[26] As long as there are substantial evidence in support of the Ombudsman and the Sandiganbayan's decisions, these decisions will not be overturned.[27]