This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2006-09-15 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| Mere reiteration of issues already passed upon by the court does not automatically make a motion for reconsideration pro forma. What is essential is compliance with the requisites of the Rules.[29] | |||||
|
2001-10-18 |
BELLOSILLO, J. |
||||
| Article 2199 of the Civil Code provides that one is entitled to adequate compensation only for such pecuniary loss suffered by him as is "duly proved."[20] This provision denies the grant of speculative damages, or such damage not actually proved to have existed and to have been caused to the party claiming the same.[21] Actual damages, to be recoverable, must not only be capable of proof, but must actually be proved with reasonable degree of certainty. Courts cannot simply rely on speculation, conjecture or guesswork in determining the fact and amount of damages.[22] | |||||