This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2000-05-12 |
KAPUNAN, J. |
||||
| Accused-appellant Mercado contends that the prosecution failed to show that she had given the complainants the distinct impression that she had the power or ability to send the complainants abroad such as to convince them to part with their money in order to be so employed,[52] as required in Darvin vs. Court of Appeals.[53] | |||||