This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-08-25 |
PUNO, J. |
||||
| We stress again that the fundamental and essential right of due process cannot be dispensed with.[17] Notice to enable the other party to be heard and to present evidence is not a mere technicality or a trivial matter in any administrative proceedings but an indispensable ingredient of due process.[18] Thus, in Marino v. Salud,[19] we held that the right "to a full and fair hearing should not be compromised." We quoted our ruling in Abalos v. Civil Service Commission[20] - | |||||