This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-04-06 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Cessation from office of respondent by resignation[15] or retirement[16] neither warrants the dismissal of the administrative complaint filed against him while he was still in the service[17] nor does it render said administrative case moot and academic.[18] The jurisdiction that was this Court's at the time of the filing of the administrative complaint was not lost by the mere fact that the respondent public official had ceased in office during the pendency of his case.[19] Respondent's resignation does not preclude the finding of any administrative liability to which he shall still be answerable.[20] | |||||