This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2010-03-15 |
VILLARAMA, JR., J. |
||||
| From the foregoing, it seems obvious that when a teacher engages in extra-marital relationship, especially when the parties are both married, such behaviour amounts to immorality, justifying his termination from employment. [33] | |||||
|
2007-10-26 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| Petitioner EDI claims that private respondent Gran was afforded due process, since he was allowed to work and improve his capabilities for five months prior to his termination.[51] EDI also claims that the requirements of due process, as enunciated in Santos, Jr. v. NLRC,[52] and Malaya Shipping Services, Inc. v. NLRC,[53] cited by the CA in its Decision, were properly observed in the present case. | |||||