This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-04-29 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| The trial court believed that petitioners' action was ultimately one for reversion of the Subject Property to the public domain. Based on the testimony of Engineer Naval and the case of Nagaño v. Court of Appeals,[28] it declared that the State, represented by the Office of the Solicitor General, is the party-in-interest in an action for cancellation of a certificate of title illegally issued in the name of a private individual, because the eventual effect of such cancellation is the reversion of the property to the State. | |||||