This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-06-08 |
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J. |
||||
| Had respondent Judge been more circumspect in going over the pertinent provisions of R.A. No. 9165, she would certainly arrive at the same conclusion. It does not even take an interpretation of the law but a plain and simple reading thereof. Furthermore, had respondent judge kept herself abreast of jurisprudence and decisions of the Court,[24] she would have been apprised that in all the hundreds and hundreds of cases[25] decided by the Court, methamphetamine hydrochloride or shabu had always been considered as a dangerous drug. | |||||