This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2006-06-21 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| is a self-serving negative defense that cannot be given greater weight than the declaration of a credible witness who testifies on affirmative matters.[64] There is no shortage of cases on court employees grave misconduct involving theft. The prevailing jurisprudence reveals the Courts intense disapproval of these acts. | |||||
|
2004-01-15 |
PANGANIBAN, J. |
||||
| The first six assigned errors raised by appellant are factual in nature, if not collateral to the resolution of the principal issues. As consistently held by this Court, the findings of the trial court on the credibility of witnesses and their testimonies are entitled to a high degree of respect and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of any showing that the trial judge gravely abused his discretion or overlooked, misunderstood or misapplied material facts or circumstances of weight and substance that could affect the outcome of the case.[14] | |||||