This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2013-06-13 |
SERENO, C.J. |
||||
| The rule is that "where there is no evidence to indicate that the prosecution witness was actuated by improper motive, the presumption is that he was not so actuated and that he would not prevaricate and cause damnation to one who brought him no harm or injury."[41] | |||||