You're currently signed in as:
User

PURIFICACION G. TABANG v. NLRC

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

2010-10-20
BRION, J.
In Okol v. Slimmers World International,[40] citing Tabang v. National Labor Relations Commission,[41] we held that -
2009-12-11
CARPIO, J.
The issue revolves mainly on whether petitioner was an employee or a corporate officer of Slimmers World. Section 25 of the Corporation Code enumerates corporate officers as the president, secretary, treasurer and such other officers as may be provided for in the by-laws. In Tabang v. NLRC,[12] we held that an "office" is created by the charter of the corporation and the officer is elected by the directors or stockholders. On the other hand, an "employee" usually occupies no office and generally is employed not by action of the directors or stockholders but by the managing officer of the corporation who also determines the compensation to be paid to such employee.
2007-06-29
NACHURA, J.
It has been held that an "office" is created by the charter of the corporation and the officer is elected by the directors or stockholders. On the other hand, an "employee" usually occupies no office and generally is employed not by action of the directors or stockholders but by the managing officer of the corporation who also determines the compensation to be paid to such employee.[45]