This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-10-26 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| The rule on litis pendentia does not require that the case later in time should yield to the earlier case; what is required merely is that there be another pending action, not a prior pending action.[10] Neither is it required that the party be served with summons before lis pendens can apply; it is the filing of the action, not the receipt of summons, which determines priority in date.[11] | |||||