Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR Nos. 174457-59 2012-12-05	EXPRESS INVESTMENTS III PRIVATE LTD. v. BAYAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS VILLARAMA, JR., J.
On May 26, 2005, Bayantel filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition[39] docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 89894 in the Court of Appeals. Said petition assailed the Rehabilitation Court's Orders dated November 9, 2004 and March 15, 2005, for purportedly conferring upon the Monitoring Committee, powers of management and control over its operations.
	GR NO. 158244 2005-08-09	ERNESTO PONCE v. NLRC CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
Furthermore, it has also been held that after voluntarily submitting a cause and encountering an adverse decision on the merits, it is too late for the loser to question the jurisdiction or power of the court. . . And in Littleton vs. Burges, 16 Wyo, 58, the Court said that it is not right for a party who has affirmed and invoked the jurisdiction of a court in a particular matter to secure an affirmative relief, to afterwards deny that same jurisdiction to escape a penalty.[25]