This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2007-01-23 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| Reiterating the ruling of this Court in Laguio v. NLRC,[11] the Court of Appeals held that mere substantial identity of the incorporators of two corporations does not necessarily imply fraud, nor warrant the piercing of the veil of corporate fiction. | |||||
|
2000-10-13 |
PARDO, J. |
||||
| It is basic that a corporation has a personality separate and distinct from those composing it as well as from that of any other legal entity to which it may be related.[44] Clear and convincing evidence is needed to pierce the veil of corporate fiction.[45] In this case, we find no evidence to show that MHICL and MHC are one and the same entity. | |||||