This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2005-04-29 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| The petitioner cites our ruling in the case of Saballa v. NLRC,[23] where we held that financial statements audited by independent auditors constitute the normal method of proof of the profit and loss performance of the company. Our ruling in the case of Bogo-Medellin Sugarcane Planters Association, Inc., et al. v. NLRC, et al.[24] was likewise invoked. In this case, we held: … The Court has previously ruled that financial statements audited by independent external auditors constitute the normal method of proof of the profit and loss performance of a company. On the matter of the withdrawal of the service award, the petitioner argues that it is the employee's length of service which is taken as a factor in the grant of this benefit, and not whether the company acquired profit or not.[25] | |||||
|
2003-10-08 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Jean de Castro,[5] fifteen (15) years old, also testified that on 18 April 1999 at around noon she was inside the bedroom of their house with her father when the latter forcibly removed her clothes. The appellant, after taking off his shorts and t-shirt, placed himself on top of Jean who tried to free herself by wriggling and pushing him away. The appellant, while kissing his daughter on different parts of her body, "put his penis on (sic) her vagina."[6] Jean testified that the sexual molestation of 18 April was repeated on 7 June 1999 when she was alone with appellant in their house at Pallocan, Batangas City. The appellant again inserted his penis into her vagina. It was then that she went to her aunt Felisa to whom she revealed everything.[7] Together, they went to the barangay captain and reported the incident.[8] She further stated that her father deserved to die for what he had done to them.[9] | |||||