This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2007-04-27 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
| In People v. Gabris[37]wherein the minor rape victim had conflicting statements as to the particular hour of the day when the rape was committed, the Court held that the inconsistencies referred "only to minor matters which do not detract from the credibility of the complainant or impair the evidence of the prosecution."[38] What is important is that, as the appellate court observed, CCC was "unfaltering in her declaration of the occurrence of rape" and that she positively identified accused-appellant as the perpetrator of the crime. | |||||
|
2001-12-19 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| The last prosecution witness was Lucita Dimalata. She testified that she arrived from Malaybalay at 4:00 in the afternoon of March 21, 1998 at the same time that Honeybee and Lorlyn came from the Seventh Day Adventist church. According to Lucita, she learned about the incident because Lorlyn told her that she was not going to get near her Uncle Rowing again, because he had removed her underwear and placed himself on top of her and "made a pump of his private parts." Honeybee confirmed what Lorlyn had said, because she saw the incident. Lucita asked Lorlyn whether she had told her grandmother about the incident. Lorlyn said she had not because accused-appellant had warned her that he would throw her into a hole if she did.[9] | |||||