This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-05-26 |
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J. |
||||
| Petitioner argues that even on the assumption that respondent did not benefit from the misdeeds, still, the mere act of falsifying company records and documents is already sufficient to warrant respondent's termination from employment. Moreover, such an act is pure and simple dishonesty and reflects on the moral character of the employee and his fitness to continue in employment as a salesman. Citing the cases of Filipro, Inc. v. NLRC,[9] Bernardo v. NLRC,[10] Mirano et al v. NLRC,[11] and; Gonzales v. NLRC,[12] petitioner maintains that the right of management to terminate the services of employees found to have falsified company records or documents has been repeatedly upheld by this Court. | |||||