You're currently signed in as:
User

PEDRO O. PALMERIA v. NLRC

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2011-09-21
DEL CASTILLO, J.
Thus, we find that the CA properly disregarded the salary increases and correctly computed Uy's back wages based on the salary rate at the time of Uy's dismissal plus the regular allowances that she had been receiving likewise at the time of her dismissal.[36] The CA also correctly deleted the signing bonus, medicine allowance, medical and doctor's allowance and dental care allowance, as they were all not proven to have been granted to Uy at the time of her dismissal from service.