This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2015-06-22 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| In Union Bank of the Philippines v. People,[16] the Court said that both provisions categorically place the venue and jurisdiction over criminal cases not only in the court where the offense was committed, but also where any of its essential ingredients took place. In other words, the venue of action and of jurisdiction are deemed sufficiently alleged where the Information states that the offense was committed or some of its essential ingredients occurred at a place within the territorial jurisdiction of the court. | |||||