You're currently signed in as:
User

WELLINGTON INVESTMENT v. CRESENCIANO B. TRAJANO

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2007-10-19
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
In Union of Filipro Employees v. Vivar, Jr.[42] the Court held that "[t]he divisor assumes an important role in determining whether or not holiday pay is already included in the monthly paid employee's salary and in the computation of his daily rate".  This ruling was applied in Wellington Investment and Manufacturing Corporation v. Trajano,[43] Producers Bank of the Philippines v. National Labor Relations Commission[44] and Odango v. National Labor Relations Commission,[45] among others.[46]
2004-03-15
CARPIO MORALES, J.
that the entitlement to ten days of holiday pay shall be reduced to nine when two holidays fall on the same day. Petitioner's assertion that Wellington v. Trajano[14] has "overruled" the DOLE March 11, 1993 Explanatory Bulletin does not lie. In Wellington, the issue was whether monthly-paid employees are entitled to an additional day's pay if a