This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-04-16 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| Third, further weakening accused-appellant's defense, even assuming arguendo that they were lovers, is that rape could still have been committed if he had carnal knowledge with private complainant against her will.[17] This Court has consistently ruled that a "love affair" does not justify rape, for the beloved cannot be sexually violated against her will.[18] | |||||