This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-08-28 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| Cundangan argues that the aforementioned 87 ballots were not WBOP considering that each of them bears a distinctive handwriting and does not appear to be objectionable.[7] For his part, Chua insists that the said ballots were WBOP, pointing out that his revisors had been able to identify the said ballots to have been clearly written by only one hand during the revision proceedings.[8] Citing Erni v. Commission on Elections,[9] Chua likewise avers that evidence aliunde is not necessary for the COMELEC to determine whether the questioned ballots were written by one hand.[10] | |||||