This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2015-01-21 |
LEONEN, J. |
||||
| Concerned about the imminent threat of prosecution for their exercise of free speech, petitioners initiated this case through this petition for certiorari and prohibition with application for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order.[14] They question respondents' notice dated February 22, 2013 and letter issued on February 27, 2013. They pray that: (1) the petition be given due course; (2) a temporary restraining order (TRO) and/or a writ of preliminary injunction be issued restraining respondents from further proceeding in enforcing their orders for the removal of the Team Patay tarpaulin; and (3) after notice and hearing, a decision be rendered declaring the questioned orders of respondents as unconstitutional and void, and permanently restraining respondents from enforcing them or any other similar order.[15] | |||||
|
2008-07-16 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| This point was reemphasized by the Court in Mariano v. COMELEC:[43] | |||||