This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2012-02-15 |
REYES, J. |
||||
| The indispensability of the "written notice requirement" for purposes of the exercise of the right of redemption was explained by this Court in Barcellano v. Bañas,[16] thus: Nothing in the records and pleadings submitted by the parties shows that there was a written notice sent to the respondents. Without a written notice, the period of thirty days within which the right of legal pre-emption may be exercised, does not start. | |||||