This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-06-19 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| Furthermore, Section 3, Rule 65 of the Revised Rules of Court also prescribes that a petition for mandamus can be given due course only if there is no other plain, speedy and adequate remedy available in the course of law.[45] In this case, petitioners already availed themselves of administrative remedies by appealing CSC-FO Director Abucejo's disapproval of their appointments to the CSC-RO, and thereafter, to the CSC Proper. When even the CSC Proper disapproved their appointments, petitioners appealed to the Court of Appeals in CEB-S.P. No. 00665, and when they were again unsuccessful in the latter recourse, they appealed once more to this Court in G.R. No. 181559. After all the administrative, as well as judicial remedies which petitioners actually availed themselves of, they cannot persuade this Court that there is no other plain, speedy and adequate remedy available to them in the course of law, to justify the issuance herein of a writ of mandamus in their favor. | |||||
|
2007-07-12 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| However, it appears that petitioners timely appealed Director Abucejo's action to the CSC Regional Office No. VII, Cebu City which denied the same in a Decision[14] dated February 14, 2002. The latter decision was likewise affirmed by the CSC in Resolution No. 040932[15] on August 23, 2004. Said resolution is now the subject of a Petition for Review under Rule 43, pending before the Court of Appeals, Cebu City.[16] | |||||