This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2003-08-05 |
DAVIDE JR., C.J. |
||||
| As for Crisanto's impotency, it is a defense which is both a physical and medical question that should be satisfactorily established with the aid of an expert competent testimony[32] in order to overturn the presumption that exists in favor of potency. In this, we hold that he, too, has failed. | |||||