This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2003-07-11 |
CALLEJO, SR., J. |
||||
| sufficient to overcome the prosecution's overwhelming evidence against them. It bears stressing that the appellants were not aware that Elpidio had witnessed the crime; hence, they did not expect that someone would point to them as the culprits. The appellants' plaint on their arrest and detention does not hold water since they failed to raise the same before their arraignment.[43] The Crime Committed by the Appellants | |||||