You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. BERNARDO OMPAD

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2009-06-18
MENDOZA, J.
In People v. Ompad, Jr.,[25] it was settled that delay in divulging the names of perpetrators of crimes, if sufficiently explained, does not impair the credibility of the witness and his testimony. The initial reluctance of a witness due to fear of reprisal is common and does not impair his credibility. What matters is that Venancia and Gaudencio testified, and the trial court found their testimonies credible.