This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2016-01-18 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Thus, having jurisdiction over the PNRC, the CSC had authority to modify the penalty and order the dismissal of petitioner from the service. Under the Administrative Code of 1987,[6] as well as decisions[7] of this Court, the CSC has appellate jurisdiction on administrative disciplinary cases involving the imposition of a penalty of suspension for more than thirty (30) days, or fine in an amount exceeding thirty (30) days salary. The CA, therefore, did not err when it agreed with the CSC that the latter had appellate jurisdiction, thus:The Court cites with approval the disquisition of the CSC in this regard: | |||||
|
2014-06-10 |
LEONEN, J. |
||||
| The same ratio would be reiterated and become the prevailing doctrine on the matter in Magpale, Jr. v. Civil Service Commission,[51] Navarro v. Civil Service Commission and Export Processing Zone,[52] University of the Philippines v. Civil Service Commission,[53] and Del Castillo v. Civil Service Commission.[54] | |||||