This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2005-06-28 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| Petitioners cite the case of Bayubay v. Court of Appeals,[22] and argue that the MCTC's decision was without jurisdictional or legal basis because the MCTC did not issue a preliminary conference order. They assert that the 10-day period to file position papers and affidavits only starts after the parties had received a preliminary conference order. They insist they were denied due process when the MCTC decided the cases based merely on private respondent's Complaints and affidavit, without considering their Answers. | |||||