This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2000-12-14 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| Similarly, in Top Management Programs Corporation v. Court of Appeals,[22] the Court denied a petition to annul an order of the trial court, noting that no extrinsic fraud could be ascribed to the conduct of the prevailing party, holding as follows: Petitioner has not pointed out any act of the prevailing party preventing it from fully ventilating its case. If ever there was any failure in the presentation of its case, the same is caused not by private respondents but by his own inaction. Petitioner was not a party to the case before the lower court, and it did nothing to bring to the court's attention its problem. Hence, the lower court was not obligated to notify the petitioners of its orders. | |||||